ECNU at SemEval-2016 Task 6: Relevant or not? Supportive or not? A two-step learning system for automatic Detecting Stance in Tweets

26Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes our submissions to Task 6, i.e., Detecting Stance in Tweets, in SemEval 2016, which aims at detecting the stance of tweets towards given target. There are three stance labels: Favor (directly or indirectly by supporting given target), Against (directly or indirectly by opposing or criticizing given target), and None (none of the above). To address this task, we present a two-step learning system, which performs two steps, i.e., relevance detection and orientation detection, in a pipeline-based processing procedure. Our system ranked the 5th among 19 teams.

References Powered by Scopus

Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior

198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Identifying users with opposing opinions in Twitter debates

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning sentiment-inherent word embedding for word-level and sentence-level sentiment analysis

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Stance detection: A survey

270Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Topical stance detection for twitter: A two-phase LSTM model using attention

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A novel approach to stance detection in social media tweets by fusing ranked lists and sentiments

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Z., & Lan, M. (2016). ECNU at SemEval-2016 Task 6: Relevant or not? Supportive or not? A two-step learning system for automatic Detecting Stance in Tweets. In SemEval 2016 - 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Proceedings (pp. 451–457). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s16-1073

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

69%

Researcher 6

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 36

80%

Linguistics 5

11%

Neuroscience 2

4%

Engineering 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free