Biomolecular Interaction analysis using an optical surface plasmon resonance biosensor: The marquardt algorithm vs Newton iteration algorithm

7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Kinetic analysis of biomolecular interactions are powerfully used to quantify the binding kinetic constants for the determination of a complex formed or dissociated within a given time span. Surface plasmon resonance biosensors provide an essential approach in the analysis of the biomolecular interactions including the interaction process of antigenantibody and receptors-ligand. The binding affinity of the antibody to the antigen (or the receptor to the ligand) reflects the biological activities of the control antibodies (or receptors) and the corresponding immune signal responses in the pathologic process. Moreover, both the association rate and dissociation rate of the receptor to ligand are the substantial parameters for the study of signal transmission between cells. A number of experimental data may lead to complicated real-time curves that do not fit well to the kinetic model. This paper presented an analysis approach of biomolecular interactions established by utilizing the Marquardt algorithm. This algorithm was intensively considered to implement in the homemade bioanalyzer to perform the nonlinear curve-fitting of the association and disassociation process of the receptor to ligand. Compared with the results from the Newton iteration algorithm, it shows that the Marquardt algorithm does not only reduce the dependence of the initial value to avoid the divergence but also can greatly reduce the iterative regression times. The association and dissociation rate constants, k a, k d and the affinity parameters for the biomolecular interaction, K A, K D, were experimentally obtained 6.969×10 5 mL· g -1 s -1, 0.00073 s -1, 9.5466×10 8 mL· g -1 and 1.0475×10 -9 g· mL -1, respectively from the injection of the HBsAg solution with the concentration of 16ng· mL -1. The kinetic constants were evaluated distinctly by using the obtained data from the curve-fitting results.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Sensorgram showing the association and dissociation processes of biomolecular interaction between HBsAg and HbsAb. The data marked with a triangle is obtained in the average of more than three sets of measurement results in RU. This sensorgram is showing that the HBsAg was binding on the specific HBsAb (association phase) starting from the injection point a and reaches an equilibrium after approximately 251s. From the dissociation starting point b, the dissociation phase was formed sequentially. The microfludic cell of this SPR bioanalyzer was kept at a constant temperature of 37°C.
  • Fig 2. The fitting results obtained from both Newton Iteration algorithm and Marquardt algorithm. The data marked with a triangle is obtained in the average of more than three sets of measurement results in RU, and the fitted curve was marked with a solid line. A. The curve-fitting using the Newton Iteration algorithm with the initial value of 0.0095, B. The curve-fitting using the Newton Iteration algorithm with the initial value of 0.011, C. The curve-fitting using the Marquardt algorithm with the initial value of 0.0095, D. The curve-fitting using the Marquardt algorithm with the initial value of 0.011.
  • Table 1. Kinetic constants of molecular interaction between HBsAg and HBsAb.

References Powered by Scopus

400Citations
313Readers
Get full text
385Citations
515Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, J., Ma, L., Wang, S., Yang, J., Chang, K., Hu, X., … Zhao, Y. (2015). Biomolecular Interaction analysis using an optical surface plasmon resonance biosensor: The marquardt algorithm vs Newton iteration algorithm. PLoS ONE, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132098

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘20‘2202468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Researcher 3

30%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

43%

Engineering 2

29%

Chemical Engineering 1

14%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0