Apoyo psicológico en desastres: Propuesta de un modelo de atención basado en revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis

31Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A search for meta analyses and systematic reviews on psychological support to disaster victims was carried out to devise a local support model. Based on 36 meta analyses and systematic reviews, the support should be carried out in five echelon levels: diffusion, social support, general medical care, general psychiatric care and psychiatric care carried out by experts. Only victims with well-established formal psychiatric disorders should receive psychotherapy or psychotropic medication. The rest should only receive psychological first aid. According to the best evidence available, a model for psychological care is proposed.

References Powered by Scopus

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey

8386Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis

2941Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City

1535Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Validation of the short posttraumatic stress disorder rating interview (SPRINT-E) in a sample of people affected by F-27 Chilean earthquake and tsunami

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and Preliminary Italian Validation of the Emergency Response and Psychological Adjustment Scale

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Severity of trauma, optimism, posttraumatic growth and well-being in survivors of a natural disaster

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Figueroa, R. A., Marín, H., & González, M. (2010). Apoyo psicológico en desastres: Propuesta de un modelo de atención basado en revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Revista Medica de Chile, 138(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872010000200001

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 48

62%

Researcher 17

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 69

66%

Medicine and Dentistry 18

17%

Social Sciences 12

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free