The Regulation of Ship Emissions in Canadian Northwest Atlantic and Arctic Waters: Is There a Need for Consistency and Equity?

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Since the adoption of Annex VI of the International Convention on the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973/78, the International Maritime Organization has gradually expanded the scope of ship emission regulation to include VOCs, SOx, NOx, particulate matter and, more recently, greenhouse gas emissions. This regulatory effort has not been integrated and displays some inconsistency and even fragmentation, resulting in different levels of environment protection for different regions and even potential conflicts between standards. The regulation of use and carriage of heavy sulphur fuel oil may lead to increase of clean fuel use and thereby produce more CO2 emissions. Designation of emission control areas under Annex VI has benefitted public health in the Baltic, North Sea and North American waters, but not Arctic waters and coastal communities adjacent to international trade routes elsewhere. This chapter discusses the prospects and pitfalls of ship emissions regulation and argues for the development of an integrated approach consistent with the IMO’s own principles of regulation and enhancement of air emission standards in Arctic waters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chircop, A. (2020). The Regulation of Ship Emissions in Canadian Northwest Atlantic and Arctic Waters: Is There a Need for Consistency and Equity? In Springer Polar Sciences (pp. 249–264). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44975-9_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free