Measuring perceived exercise capability and investigating its relationship with childhood obesity: A feasibility study

19Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background/Objectives:According to the COM-B ('Capability', 'Opportunity', 'Motivation' and 'Behaviour') model of behaviour, three factors are essential for behaviour to occur: capability, opportunity and motivation. Obese children are less likely to feel capable of exercising. The implementation of a new methodological approach to investigate the relationship between perceived exercise capability (PEC) and childhood obesity was conducted, which involved creating a new instrument, and demonstrating how it can be used to measure obesity intervention outcomes.Subjects/Methods:A questionnaire aiming to measure perceived exercise capability, opportunity and motivation was systematically constructed using the COM-B model and administered to 71 obese children (aged 9-17 years (12.24±0.2.01), body mass index (BMI) standard deviation scores (SDS) 2.80±0.660) at a weight-management camp in northern England. Scale validity and reliability was assessed. Relationships between PEC, as measured by the questionnaire, and BMI SDS were investigated for the children at the weight-management camp, and for 45 Spanish schoolchildren (aged 9-13 years, (10.52±1.23), BMI SDS 0.80±0.99). A pilot study, demonstrating how the questionnaire can be used to measure the effectiveness of an intervention aiming to bring about improved PEC for weight-management camp attendees, was conducted. No participants withdrew from these studies.Results:The questionnaire domain (exercise capability, opportunity and motivation) composite scales were found to have adequate internal consistency (a=0.712-0.796) and construct validity (χ 2/degrees of freedom=1.55, root mean square error of approximation=0.072, comparative fit index=0.92). Linear regression revealed that low PEC was associated with higher baseline BMI SDS for both UK (b=-0.289, P=0.010) and Spanish (b=-0.446, P=0.047) participants. Pilot study findings provide preliminary evidence for PEC improvements through intervention being achievable, and measurable using the questionnaire.Conclusions:Evidence is presented for reliability and validity of the questionnaire, and for feasibility of its use in the context of a childhood obesity intervention. Future research could investigate the link between PEC and childhood obesity further.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

79773Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change

35874Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions

7755Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Acceptability, reliability, and validity of a brief measure of capabilities, opportunities, and motivations (“COM-B”)

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using motion-sensor games to encourage physical activity for adults with intellectual disability

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using COM-B model in identifying facilitators, barriers and needs of community pharmacists in implementing weight management services in Malaysia: a qualitative study

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taylor, M. J., Arriscado, D., Vlaev, I., Taylor, D., Gately, P., & Darzi, A. (2016). Measuring perceived exercise capability and investigating its relationship with childhood obesity: A feasibility study. International Journal of Obesity, 40(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.210

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

64%

Researcher 18

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

35%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

27%

Psychology 13

25%

Social Sciences 6

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free