Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: A case control study

20Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Backgrounds: Repair of full-thickness rotator cuff (RC) tears is routinely performed using suture anchors, which produce secure and effective soft tissue fixation to bone. The aim of this prospective study is to compare the long-term outcomes of single row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) performed using metal or biodegradable suture anchors. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in shoulder function using metal or biodegradable suture anchors as evaluated by UCLA shoulder score, Wolfgang criteria, and Oxford shoulder score. Methods: Arthroscopic RCR was performed in 110 patients included in this case control study. They were divided into 2 groups of 51 and 59 patients respectively. Metal suture anchors were used in group 1, and biodegradable suture anchors in group 2. Results were obtained at a mean follow up of 4.05 + 2 years. Clinical outcomes and functional outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean modified UCLA shoulder score was 26.9 + 7.1 in group 1, and 27.7 + 6.5 in group 2 (P = 0.5); the mean Wolfgang score was 13.3 + 3.3 in group 1, and 14 + 2.6 in group 2 (P = 0.3); the mean OSS was 23.7 + 11.4 in group 1, and 20.7 + 9.2 points in group 2 (P = 0.1). The mean active anterior elevation was 163.5° + 28.2° in group 1 and 163.6° + 26.9 in group 2 (P = 0.9); the mean active external rotation was 46° + 19.7° in group 1 and 44.6° + 16.3° in group 2 (P = 0.7). The mean strength in anterior elevation was 4.8.02 + 23.52 N in group 1, and 43.12 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.2); the mean strength in external rotation was 48.02 + 22.54 N in group 1 and 46.06 + 17.64 N in group 2 (P = 0.6); the mean strength in internal rotation was 67.62 + 29.4 N in group 1, and 68.6 + 25.48 N in group 2 (P = 0.9). Conclusions: There are no statistically significant differences at a mean follow-up of 4.05 + 2 years in clinical and functional outcomes of single row arthroscopic RCR using metallic or biodegradable suture anchors for RC < 5 cm.

References Powered by Scopus

Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction

826Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Osteolytic changes accompanying degradation of absorbable fracture fixation implants

279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Movin and bonar scores assess the same characteristics of tendon histology

218Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Evolution of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cost-effectiveness of supervised versus unsupervised rehabilitation for rotator-cuff repair: Systematic review and meta-analysis

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conservative versus accelerated rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Longo, U. G., Petrillo, S., Loppini, M., Candela, V., Rizzello, G., Maffulli, N., & Denaro, V. (2019). Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: A case control study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2834-3

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

68%

Researcher 5

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

13%

Chemical Engineering 3

10%

Engineering 3

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0