Effect of source, surfactant, and deposition process on electronic properties of nanotube arrays

8Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The electronic properties of arrays of carbon nanotubes from several different sources differing in the manufacturing process used with a variety of average properties such as length, diameter, and chirality are studied. We used several common surfactants to disperse each of these nanotubes and then deposited them on Si wafers from their aqueous solutions using dielectrophoresis. Transport measurements were performed to compare and determine the effect of different surfactants, deposition processes, and synthesis processes on nanotubes synthesized using CVD, CoMoCAT, laser ablation, and HiPCO. © 2011 Dheeraj Jain et al.

References Powered by Scopus

Extreme oxygen sensitivity of electronic properties of carbon nanotubes

2931Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Individually Suspended Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Various Surfactants

1559Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Separation of metallic from semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes

1503Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

High-performance semiconducting nanotube inks: Progress and prospects

156Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deterministic assembly of functional nanostructures using nonuniform electric fields

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Properties of PEG-capped CdS nanopowders synthesized under very mild conditions

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burke, P. J., Jain, D., Rouhi, N., Rutherglen, C., Densmore, C. G., & Doorn, S. K. (2011). Effect of source, surfactant, and deposition process on electronic properties of nanotube arrays. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/174268

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

76%

Researcher 4

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 8

44%

Chemistry 5

28%

Materials Science 3

17%

Physics and Astronomy 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0