Comparative study on high-strength structural elements and CNT additions

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) show extraordinary properties such as high strength and stiffness, the highest among known materials. This is what makes them potential candidates for concrete reinforcement. This paper explores the applicability of CNT in cementitious matrices comparing results derived from high-strength concrete and conventional concrete, as well as conventional concrete. For the execution of this research, and in order to analyze cement mortars with additions when compared to high-strength concrete, different types of CNT have been depicted and selected. After the characterization of different cement pastes obtained, structural elements have been measured. This analysis leads us to the conclusion that the most suitable mechanical strengthening agent for laboratory scale small samples is the use of CNT, since we do not detect significant differences between the structural elements dimensions and high-strength concrete regarding pastes with CNT.

References Powered by Scopus

Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon

42067Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

C<inf>60</inf>: Buckminsterfullerene

15042Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load

4994Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effect of carbon nanotubes on compressive, flexural and tensile strengths of Portland cement-based materials: A systematic literature review

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fraga, J. L., del Campo, J. M., García, J. ángel, & Escolano, F. (2016). Comparative study on high-strength structural elements and CNT additions. Revista de La Construccion, 15(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-915X2016000200009

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

57%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Chemical Engineering 1

14%

Chemistry 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free