Analysis and Design of Fuel Cell Systems for Aviation

93Citations
Citations of this article
232Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, the design of fuel cells for the main energy supply of passenger transportation aircraft is discussed. Using a physical model of a fuel cell, general design considerations are derived. Considering different possible design objectives, the trade-off between power density and efficiency is discussed. A universal cost-benefit curve is derived to aid the design process. A weight factor wP is introduced, which allows incorporating technical (e.g., system mass and efficiency) as well as non-technical design objectives (e.g., operating cost, emission goals, social acceptance or technology affinity, political factors). The optimal fuel cell design is not determined by the characteristics of the fuel cell alone, but also by the characteristics of the other system components. The fuel cell needs to be designed in the context of the whole energy system. This is demonstrated by combining the fuel cell model with simple and detailed design models of a liquid hydrogen tank. The presented methodology and models allows assessing the potential of fuel cell systems for mass reduction of future passenger aircraft.

Figures

  • Table 1. Model parameters used.
  • Table 1. Cont.
  • Figure 1. Polarisation curve (blue) and power curve (red) of a plymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Dotted line marks the high current branch above the maximum power point.
  • Figure 2. Cell efficiency vs. normalized cell power. Dotted line marks the high current branch above the maximum power point.
  • Figure 3. Efficiency gain that is obtained from lowering the power as function of operating power. The dotted line marks the branch above the maximum power point. Analysis of 41 experimental polarization curves [23] is marked in grey: the dashed line marks the average and the grey solid line mark the 99% confidence interval.
  • Figure 4. Objective function of power vs. efficiency optimization for 4 different weights. Dotted: wP = 1, dash-dotted: wP = 0.37, dashed: wP = 0.18, solid wP = 0.
  • Figure 5. Mass of the fuel cell system and its components as function of working point current density for a reference flight mission with a power demand of Prq =16.3 MW and an energy demand of Erq = 63.7 MWh, i.e., a medium haul flight [16]. Blue: total mass of the system; Red: mass of the fuel cell; Yellow: mass of the hydrogen fuel; Purple: mass of the empty tank; Green: mass of the tank system (tank+hydrogen). Dotted lines mark the branch above the maximum power point.
  • Figure 6. Fuel cell oversize for minimum fuel cell system weight as function of the ratio of tank-to-fuel cell mass. Red: Stationary tank design. Blue: Advanced tank design of Winnefeld et al. [16].

References Powered by Scopus

844Citations
899Readers
Get full text
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kadyk, T., Winnefeld, C., Hanke-Rauschenbach, R., & Krewer, U. (2018). Analysis and Design of Fuel Cell Systems for Aviation. Energies, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020375

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 79

71%

Researcher 22

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 82

77%

Energy 15

14%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

5%

Chemical Engineering 4

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0