Four subgroups based on tau levels in Alzheimer’s disease observed in two independent cohorts

21Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: As Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology presents decades before dementia manifests, unbiased biomarker cut-points may more closely reflect presence of pathology than clinically defined cut-points. Currently, unbiased cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tau cut-points are lacking. Methods: We investigated CSF t-tau and p-tau cut-points across the clinical spectrum using Gaussian mixture modelling, in two independent cohorts (Amsterdam Dementia Cohort and ADNI). Results: Individuals with normal cognition (NC) (total n = 1111), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (total n = 1213) and Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD) (total n = 1524) were included. In both cohorts, four CSF t- and p-tau distributions and three corresponding cut-points were identified. Increasingly high tau subgroups were characterized by steeper MMSE decline and higher progression risk to AD (cohort/platform-dependent HR, t-tau 1.9–21.3; p-tau 2.2–9.5). Limitations: The number of subjects in some subgroups and subanalyses was small, especially in the highest tau subgroup and in tau PET analyses. Conclusions: In two independent cohorts, t-tau and p-tau levels showed four subgroups. Increasingly high tau subgroups were associated with faster clinical decline, suggesting our approach may aid in more precise prognoses.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duits, F. H., Wesenhagen, K. E. J., Ekblad, L., Wolters, E., Willemse, E. A. J., Scheltens, P., … Tijms, B. M. (2021). Four subgroups based on tau levels in Alzheimer’s disease observed in two independent cohorts. Alzheimer’s Research and Therapy, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00713-3

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

56%

Researcher 6

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

41%

Neuroscience 11

38%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

14%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0