Evaluation of anemia management by algorithms in patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Anemia commonly develops in patients with chronic kidney disease and is strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. There are currently no published studies evaluating the efficacy of a nurse-driven anemia-management protocol for patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of an anemia-management protocol in terms of achieving hemoglobin and transferrin saturation levels within the target range, as well as associated utilization of medications, relative to individualized dosing of medications by nephrologists. Methods: An algorithm for nurse-driven management of anemia was introduced in April 2009 at a kidney function clinic in a large urban centre. The charts of patients with chronic kidney disease who were not undergoing dialysis were reviewed before (July to December 2007) and after (July to December 2009) implementation of the protocol. Patients'data for hemoglobin, transferrin saturation, and doses of iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents were collected for each of the 6-month study periods. Results: In total, 390 patients were treated for anemia before and 434 patients after introduction of the protocol. The anemia-management protocol was non-inferior to individualized dosing for maintenance of hemoglobin levels within the target range of 110-120 g/L: percentage of measured levels within target range 33.3% (485/1456) before versus 34.2% (504/1472) after (absolute difference 0.9 percentage points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.5 to 4.4). The criteria for non-inferiority were not met for maintenance of transferrin saturation within the target range of 22%-50%: percentage of levels within target range 58.8% (374/636) before versus 56.9% (403/708) after (absolute difference 1.9 percentage points, 95% CI -3.4 to 7.2). There were no statistically significant differences in mean doses of epoetin alfa, darbepoetin, or iron before and after introduction of the protocol. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences in number of dose changes for epoetin alfa, darbepoetin, or iron. Conclusion: The nurse-driven anemia-management protocol was non-inferior to dosing by nephrologists in terms of managing hemoglobin levels. It would be reasonable to use an anemia-management protocol for patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis.

References Powered by Scopus

Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease

2476Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia

1904Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease

1847Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Development and Validation of a Uremic Pruritus Treatment Algorithm and Patient Information Toolkit in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and End Stage Kidney Disease

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and validation of a constipation treatment toolkit for patients on hemodialysis

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A nurse prescriber-led protocol for anaemia management in established haemodialysis patients: A retrospective study

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rogers, J., Leung, M., Beaulieu, M., Levin, A., Burnett, S., & Zienkiewicz, A. (2011). Evaluation of anemia management by algorithms in patients with chronic kidney disease who are not receiving dialysis. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 64(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v64i2.998

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Researcher 3

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

30%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

10%

Neuroscience 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0