Relationship between key space and user performance on reduced keyboards.

16Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Small computers are much in demand for mobile computing. However, keyboard size is an obstacle to further size reduction. Reducing the space occupied by keys would affect the usability of the keyboard. On the other hand, if the keys were closer together, the fingers would reach them faster. This could improve typing performance. An experiment was therefore conducted to investigate the relationship between users' performance and the center-to-center key space of reduced-size keyboards. Eighteen touch-typists were asked to do a word typing task on five different keyboards. A standard keyboard with a key space of 19.05 mm and smaller keyboards with key spaces of 16.7, 16.0, 15.6, and 15.0 mm were used in this study. No performance degradation was found on keyboards with a key space of 16.7 mm for faster typists (those capable of about 40 wpm), including those with large fingers (97.5 percentile of Japanese adult males). For faster typists with narrow fingers, there was no performance degradation on keyboards with a key space of 15.0 mm.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

BIOMECHANICS OF THE UPPER LIMBS: MECHANICS, MODELINGAND MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURIES, SECOND EDITION

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of key size of touch screen virtual keyboards on productivity, usability, and typing biomechanics

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics: Part 1

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yoshitake, R. (1995). Relationship between key space and user performance on reduced keyboards. Applied Human Science : Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 14(6), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.2114/ahs.14.287

Readers over time

‘11‘13‘18‘19‘21‘2300.250.50.751

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Researcher 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

25%

Psychology 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0