Asymmetry of pictorial space: A cultural phenomenon

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Art experts have argued that the mirror reversal of pictorial artworks produces an alteration of their spatial content. However, this putative asymmetry of the pictorial space remains to be empirically proved and causally explained. Here, we address these issues with the ''corridor illusion,'' a size illusion triggered by the pictorial space of a receding corridor. We show that mirror-reversed corridors-receding respectively leftward and rightward-induce markedly different illusion strengths and thus convey distinct pictorial spaces. Remarkably, the illusion is stronger with the rightward corridor among native left-to-right readers (French participants, n = 40 males) but conversely stronger with the leftward corridor among native rightto- left readers (Syrian participants, n = 40 males). Together, these results demonstrate an asymmetry of the pictorial space and point to our reading/writing habits as a major cause of this phenomenon.

References Powered by Scopus

Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task

782Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex

346Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size

246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A review on various explanations of Ponzo-like illusions

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The lateralized flash-lag illusion: A psychophysical and pupillometry study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rima, S., Khalil, C., Cottereau, B. R., Trotter, Y., & Durand, J. B. (2019). Asymmetry of pictorial space: A cultural phenomenon. Journal of Vision, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1167/19.4.22

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Researcher 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

50%

Neuroscience 3

25%

Engineering 2

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 22

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free