The user innovation paradigm: Impacts on markets and welfare

134Citations
Citations of this article
334Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Innovation has traditionally been seen as the province of producers. However, theoretical and empirical research nowshows that individual users-consumers-are also a major and increasingly important source of new product and service designs. In this paper, we build a microeconomic model of a market that incorporates demand-side innovation and competition. We explain the conditions under which firms find it beneficial to invest in supporting and harvesting users' innovations, and we show that social welfare rises when firms utilize this source of innovation. Our modeling also indicates reasons for policy interventions with respect to a mixed user and producer innovation economy. From the social welfare perspective, as the share of innovating users in a market increases, profit-maximizing firms tend to switch "too late" from a focus on internal research and development to a strategy of also supporting and harvesting user innovations. Underlying this inefficiency are externalities that the producer cannot capture. Overall, our results explain when and how the proliferation of innovating users leads to a superior division of innovative labor involving complementary investments by users and producers, both benefitting producers and increasing social welfare.

References Powered by Scopus

Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy

6389Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations

1942Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design

1709Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Editorial: On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surrendering control to gain advantage: Reconciling openness and the resource-based view of the firm

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Idea rejected, tie formed: Organizations’ feedback on crowdsourced ideas

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gambardella, A., Raasch, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2017). The user innovation paradigm: Impacts on markets and welfare. Management Science, 63(5), 1450–1468. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2393

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 156

72%

Professor / Associate Prof. 35

16%

Researcher 16

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 137

70%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24

12%

Engineering 22

11%

Social Sciences 14

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free