Genetic and Morphometric Divergence of an Invasive Bird: The Introduced House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) in Brazil

16Citations
Citations of this article
78Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduced species are interesting systems for the study of contemporary evolution in new environments because of their spatial and temporal scales. For this study we had three aims: (i) to determine how genetic diversity and genetic differentiation of introduced populations of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) in Brazil varies with range expansion, (ii) to determine how genetic diversity and differentiation in Brazil compares to ancestral European populations; and (iii) to determine whether selection or genetic drift has been more influential on phenotypic divergence. We used six microsatellite markers to genotype six populations from Brazil and four populations from Europe. We found slightly reduced levels of genetic diversity in Brazilian compared to native European populations. However, among introduced populations of Brazil, we found no association between genetic diversity and time since introduction. Moreover, overall genetic differentiation among introduced populations was low indicating that the expansion took place from large populations in which genetic drift effects would likely have been weak. We found significant phenotypic divergence among sites in Brazil. Given the absence of a spatial genetic pattern, divergent selection and not genetic drift seems to be the main force behind most of the phenotypic divergence encountered. Unravelling whether microevolution (e.g., allele frequency change), phenotypic plasticity, or both mediated phenotypic divergence is challenging and will require experimental work (e.g., common garden experiments or breeding programs). © 2012 Lima et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Map of Brazil showing the different house sparrow populations sampled and the location of the release site.
  • Table 2. Polymorphic microsatellite loci used in genotyping house sparrow populations.
  • Figure 2. Comparison of different genetic diversity estimators: (Na) number of alleles (A); (Ar) allelic richness (B); (Par) private allelic richness (C); and (He) expected heterozygosity (D) from different house sparrow populations. For Europe –a and USA data from [24]; data for Finland from [58]; data for France from [59]; and data from Brazil and Europe –b where obtained from this study using all six loci (Table 1). Filled circles are introduced populations while open circles are native populations. Not all estimators were available in all the studies. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053332.g002
  • Table 5. Pairwise RST values for house sparrow populations in Brazil.
  • Table 3. Pairwise FST values for house sparrow populations in Europe (lower diagonal), values in bold are significantly different from zero after Bonferroni correction (p#0.0083) and harmonic Dest values (above the diagonal).
  • Table 4. Pairwise FST values for house sparrow populations in Brazil (lower diagonal), values in bold are significantly different from zero after Bonferroni correction (p#0.0033) and harmonic Dest values (above the diagonal).
  • Figure 3. Scatterplots of FST pairwise estimates [62] calculated using FSTAT version 2.9.3 [54] against geographical distance in km (log-transformed) for house sparrow populations of Brazil (A); pairwise harmonic mean Dest [63] calculated using SMOGD [64] against geographic distance in km (log-transformed) for house sparrow populations of Brazil (B); and pairwise RST calculated using R CALC [66] against geographic distance in km (log-transformed) for house sparrow populations of Brazil (C). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053332.g003
  • Figure 4. Comparison of phenotypic differentiation (PST – solid line) with the upper 95% confidence interval (C.I.) for neutral genetic differentiation (FST, solid red line), while the ratio c/h 2 was varied from zero to 2. The dashed black lines represents the 95% C.I. for the PST calculations, while the dashed red line represent the null assumption that c = h 2. Results are for male traits that had critical c/h2 (the value in which the lower 95% C.I. of PST is higher than the upper 95% C.I. of FST) lower than 0.5. For values with higher critical value see Fig. S1. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053332.g004

References Powered by Scopus

Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure.

16026Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis

0
12088Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research

11571Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Genetic approaches in comparative and evolutionary physiology

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The house sparrow in the service of basic and applied biology

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pstat: An R package to assess population differentiation in phenotypic traits

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lima, M. R., Macedo, R. H. F., Martins, T. L. F., Schrey, A. W., Martin, L. B., & Bensch, S. (2012). Genetic and Morphometric Divergence of an Invasive Bird: The Introduced House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) in Brazil. PLoS ONE, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053332

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 33

59%

Researcher 11

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61

90%

Environmental Science 4

6%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

3%

Neuroscience 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0