Why did rating agencies do such a bad job rating subprime securities?

37Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As of February 2008, Moody's had downgraded at least one tranche of 94.2% of the subprime RMBS issues it rated in 2006, including 100% of the 2006 RMBS backed by second-lien loans and 76.9% of the issues rated in 2007. Overall, Moody's has downgraded 53.7% and 39.2% of all of its 2006 and 2007 subprime tranches, respectively. As of March 2008, S&P had downgraded 44.3% of the subprime tranches it rated between the first quarter of 2005 and the third quarter of 2007. This included 87.2% of securities backed by second-lien mortgages. As of December 2007, Fitch had downgraded approximately 34% of the subprime tranches it rated in 2006 and in the first quarter of 2007. In February 2008, Fitch placed all of the RMBS it rated in 2006 and the first quarter of 2007 backed by subprime first-lien mortgages on Ratings Watch Negative.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Regulating credit rating agencies

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The foundations and future of financial regulation: Governance for responsibility

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why Credit Rating Agencies Exist

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hill, C. A. (2010, March). Why did rating agencies do such a bad job rating subprime securities? University of Pittsburgh Law Review. https://doi.org/10.5195/lawreview.2009.148

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

86%

Researcher 3

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14

41%

Business, Management and Accounting 13

38%

Social Sciences 5

15%

Computer Science 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free