Consensus Statement: Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies

2.3kCitations
Citations of this article
1.5kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is increasingly utilized for genetic testing of individuals with unexplained developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), or multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). Performing CMA and G-banded karyotyping on every patient substantially increases the total cost of genetic testing. The International Standard Cytogenomic Array (ISCA) Consortium held two international workshops and conducted a literature review of 33 studies, including 21,698 patients tested by CMA. We provide an evidence-based summary of clinical cytogenetic testing comparing CMA to G-banded karyotyping with respect to technical advantages and limitations, diagnostic yield for various types of chromosomal aberrations, and issues that affect test interpretation. CMA offers a much higher diagnostic yield (15%-20%) for genetic testing of individuals with unexplained DD/ID, ASD, or MCA than a G-banded karyotype (∼3%, excluding Down syndrome and other recognizable chromosomal syndromes), primarily because of its higher sensitivity for submicroscopic deletions and duplications. Truly balanced rearrangements and low-level mosaicism are generally not detectable by arrays, but these are relatively infrequent causes of abnormal phenotypes in this population (<1%). Available evidence strongly supports the use of CMA in place of G-banded karyotyping as the first-tier cytogenetic diagnostic test for patients with DD/ID, ASD, or MCA. G-banded karyotype analysis should be reserved for patients with obvious chromosomal syndromes (e.g., Down syndrome), a family history of chromosomal rearrangement, or a history of multiple miscarriages. © 2010 The American Society of Human Genetics.

Figures

  • Table 1. Assessment of Pathogenicity of a CNVa
  • Table 2. Summary of Clinical CMA Studies on 21,698 Subjects
  • Table 2. Continued
  • Figure 1. Examples of Genomic Imbalances Detected by a CMA but Not by G-Banded Karyotyping
  • Figure 2. Evolution of a Constitutional CMA Design
  • Table 3. Recommendations for CMA Testing of Individuals with Unexplained Developmental Delay/Intellectual Disability, Autism Spectrum Disorders, or Multiple Congenital Anomalies
  • Figure 3. Algorithm for CMA Testing in Patients with Unexplained DD, MR, MCA, and ASD

References Powered by Scopus

Global variation in copy number in the human genome

3485Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome

1501Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources

1493Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

1830Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders

1603Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnostic exome sequencing in persons with severe intellectual disability

1280Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, D. T., Adam, M. P., Aradhya, S., Biesecker, L. G., Brothman, A. R., Carter, N. P., … Ledbetter, D. H. (2010). Consensus Statement: Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 86(5), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25050100150200

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 534

62%

Researcher 207

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 103

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 17

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 383

40%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 285

30%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 237

25%

Neuroscience 41

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 3
News Mentions: 5
References: 5
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 39

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0