Assessing the quality of medication documentation: Development and feasibility of the MediDocQ instrument for retrospective chart review in the hospital setting

12Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective The medication process requires clear and transparent documentation in patient records. Incomplete or incorrect medication documentation may contribute to inappropriate clinical decision-making and adverse events. To comprehensively assess the quality of in-hospital medication documentation, we developed a retrospective chart review (RCR) instrument. We report on the development process, the feasibility of the instrument and describe our application of the instrument to a sample of patient records. Design Cross-sectional study using an RCR instrument to evaluate paper-based, non-standardised prescription and medication administration charts (MediDocQ). Setting Two German university hospitals. Participants Records from 1361 patients admitted between April and July 2015 were evaluated. Methods The MediDocQ development process comprised six consecutive stages: focused literature review, web-based search, initial patient record screening, review by project advisory board, focus groups with professionals and pilot testing. The final 54-item RCR instrument covers three key components of medication documentation: (1) completeness of documented information (including prescription, medication administration and pro re nata (PRN) medication), (2) quality of transcriptions and (3) compliance with chart structure, legibility, handling of deletions and chart corrections. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean values, SD, median and interquartile ranges for individual items. Results Overall, 33 out of 54 items resulted in mean values above 0.75, indicating high-quality medication documentation. Documentation quality was particularly compromised for verbal and PRN orders (which involve more steps than standard orders) and when documentation was not completed at the same time as medication administration. Conclusions MediDocQ is a patient safety instrument that can be used to evaluate the quality of medication documentation and identify components of the process where intervention is required. In our setting, standardisation of medication documentation, particularly regarding medication administration and PRN medication is a priority.

References Powered by Scopus

Medication errors observed in 36 health care facilities

594Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future

501Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring errors and adverse events in health care

345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Associations of person-related, environment-related and communication-related factors on medication errors in public and private hospitals: a retrospective clinical audit

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparing perceived psychosocial working conditions of nurses and physicians in two university hospitals in Germany with other German professionals-feasibility of scale conversion between two versions of the German Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ)

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Practical Considerations of PRN Medicines Management: An Integrative Systematic Review

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hammer, A., Wagner, A., Rieger, M. A., & Manser, T. (2019). Assessing the quality of medication documentation: Development and feasibility of the MediDocQ instrument for retrospective chart review in the hospital setting. BMJ Open, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034609

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

57%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

22%

Researcher 5

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 14

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

29%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 5

18%

Computer Science 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0