Crowds, citizens, and science: a multi-dimensional framework and agenda for future research

36Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Research projects that actively involve ‘crowds’ or non-professional ‘citizen scientists’ are attracting growing attention. Such projects promise to increase scientific productivity while also connecting science with the general public. We make three contributions. First, we argue that the largely separate literatures on ‘Crowd Science’ and ‘Citizen Science’ investigate strongly overlapping sets of projects but take different disciplinary lenses. Closer integration can enrich research on Crowd and Citizen Science (CS). Second, we propose a framework to profile projects with respect to four types of crowd contributions: activities, knowledge, resources, and decisions. This framework also accommodates machines and algorithms, which increasingly complement or replace professional and non-professional researchers as a third actor. Finally, we outline a research agenda anchored on important underlying organisational challenges of CS projects. This agenda can advance our understanding of Crowd and Citizen Science, yield practical recommendations for project design, and contribute to the broader organisational literature.

References Powered by Scopus

A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

10824Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification

3257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE DESIGN OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROL MECHANISMS.

2386Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Crowdsourcing research questions in science

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding crowdsourcing in science

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Citizen Science Approach for Analyzing Social Media With Crowdsourcing

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franzoni, C., Poetz, M., & Sauermann, H. (2022). Crowds, citizens, and science: a multi-dimensional framework and agenda for future research. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 251–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1976627

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

65%

Researcher 6

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 8

38%

Social Sciences 6

29%

Environmental Science 4

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0