Skip to main content
Book

Trust in food: A comparative and institutional analysis

Palgrave Macmillan, (2007), 1-228
DOI: 10.1057/9780230627611
203Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The BSE epidemic, GM foods, avian flu, the growth of supermarkets and the crisis in obesity have shaken consumer trust in food. Uncovering surprising differences between countries, Trust in Food examines this and challenges the idea of the consumer as a sovereign individual, demonstrating how consumption is institutionalized within society.

References Powered by Scopus

The theory of planned behavior

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
60102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme

Theory, Culture & Society
762Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How to Make a National Cuisine: Cookbooks in Contemporary India

Comparative Studies in Society and History
640Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sustainable food consumption: An overview of contemporary issues and policies

Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy
511Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methodological challenges in using practice theory in consumption research. Examples from a study on handling nutritional contestations of food consumption

Journal of Consumer Culture
221Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Changes in the practice of eating: A comparative analysis of time-use

Acta Sociologica
187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kjærnes, U., Harvey, M., & Warde, A. (2007). Trust in food: A comparative and institutional analysis. Trust in Food: A Comparative and Institutional Analysis (pp. 1–228). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627611

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

20%

Researcher 9

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 28

70%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

13%

Arts and Humanities 4

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free