Predicting AC optimal power flows: Combining deep learning and lagrangian dual methods

159Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Optimal Power Flow (OPF) problem is a fundamental building block for the optimization of electrical power systems. It is nonlinear and nonconvex and computes the generator setpoints for power and voltage, given a set of load demands. It is often solved repeatedly under various conditions, either in real-time or in large-scale studies. This need is further exacerbated by the increasing stochasticity of power systems due to renewable energy sources in front and behind the meter. To address these challenges, this paper presents a deep learning approach to the OPF. The learning model exploits the information available in the similar states of the system (which is commonly available in practical applications), as well as a dual Lagrangian method to satisfy the physical and engineering constraints present in the OPF. The proposed model is evaluated on a large collection of realistic medium-sized power systems. The experimental results show that its predictions are highly accurate with average errors as low as 0.2%. Additionally, the proposed approach is shown to improve the accuracy of the widely adopted linear DC approximation by at least two orders of magnitude.

References Powered by Scopus

64051Citations
45361Readers
Get full text

Multiplier and gradient methods

1831Citations
332Readers
Get full text
1804Citations
376Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

370Citations
3159Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fioretto, F., Mak, T. W. K., & van Hentenryck, P. (2020). Predicting AC optimal power flows: Combining deep learning and lagrangian dual methods. In AAAI 2020 - 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 630–637). AAAI press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5403

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 39

70%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

14%

Researcher 8

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 24

55%

Computer Science 15

34%

Energy 3

7%

Decision Sciences 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0