The pupillary response to mental overload

26Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The hypothesis that the pupil constricts below base level in situations of mental overload was tested. Subjects had to perform in a four-alternative forced-choice task at 75%, 100%, and 125% the speed of their maximum processing capacity. No indication of a pupillary constriction in the overload situation was found. The pupil dilated under all three conditions. The pupil diameter of male subjects significantly decreased after the sharp increase at the beginning of the experimental phases, while the female subjects’ pupil diameter remained at the same level after the initial increase. The amount of dilation depended on information load for male subjects only. Results were taken as further indication that no psychological stimulation may be specified that consistently elicits pupillary contriction. © 1977, Psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF SKIN CONDUCTANCE: A PROPOSAL FOR STANDARDIZATION

799Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ATTITUDE AND PUPIL SIZE.

311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pupillary and Cardiac Activity During Visual Attention

210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management

264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction

227Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pupil dilation during visual target detection

138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Juris, M., & Velden, M. (1977). The pupillary response to mental overload. Physiological Psychology, 5(4), 421–424. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337847

Readers over time

‘13‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

53%

Researcher 5

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

21%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 7

44%

Psychology 5

31%

Engineering 2

13%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0