Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases

1.7kCitations
Citations of this article
2.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Traditional engineering instruction is deductive, beginning with theories and progressing to the applications of those theories. Alternative teaching approaches are more inductive. Topics are introduced by presenting specific observations, case studies or problems, and theories are taught or the students are helped to discover them only after the need to know them has been established. This study reviews several of the most commonly used inductive teaching methods, including inquiry learning, problem-based learning, project-based learning, case-based teaching, discovery learning, and just-in-time teaching. The paper defines each method, highlights commonalities and specific differences, and reviews research on the effectiveness of the methods. While the strength of the evidence varies from one method to another, inductive methods are consistently found to be at least equal to, and in general more effective than, traditional deductive methods for achieving a broad range of learning outcomes.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Does active learning work? A review of the research

4807Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment

2185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues

1836Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course

746Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Engineering education and the development of expertise

493Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields

466Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 767

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 202

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 175

13%

Researcher 165

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 340

40%

Social Sciences 306

36%

Computer Science 125

15%

Business, Management and Accounting 87

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free