The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface

49Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Each design element or layer in an information system interacts with every other design layer in a synergistic, neutral, or conflicting manner. This cascade of interactions culminates in the interface, where all the prior interactions have either worked to produce effective information retrieval or to produce a hodgepodge of system elements working at cross-purposes. Very large networked and World-Wide-Web-based online databases and online public access catalogs provide numerous illustrative examples of how the cascade works. Good design requires that these interactions be well understood and properly designed for the purposes of the information system in question. Interactions among metadata and indexing systems, information system front-ends, user search capabilities, and interface design are discussed and used as illustrations for the effective design of digital library access. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Where should the person stop and the information search interface start?

254Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Subject access in online catalogs: A design model

238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Indexing and access for digital libraries and the Internet: human, database, and domain factors

132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Understanding PubMed® user search behavior through log analysis

222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interactions with search systems

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interactive information retrieval

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bates, M. J. (2002). The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface. Information Processing and Management, 38(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00041-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 47

66%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

18%

Researcher 8

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 39

55%

Social Sciences 21

30%

Engineering 6

8%

Arts and Humanities 5

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free