Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time

639Citations
Citations of this article
399Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The number of coeliac disease diagnoses has increased in the recent past and according to screening studies, the total prevalence of the disorder is around 1%. Aim: To establish whether the increased number of coeliac disease cases reflects a true rise in disease frequency. Methods: The total prevalence of coeliac disease was determined in two population-based samples representing the Finnish adult population in 1978-80 and 2000-01 and comprising 8000 and 8028 individuals, respectively. Both clinically-diagnosed coeliac disease patients and previously unrecognized cases identified by serum endomysial antibodies were taken into account. Results: Only two (clinical prevalence of 0.03%) patients had been diagnosed on clinical grounds in 1978-80, in contrast to 32 (0.52%) in 2000-01. The prevalence of earlier unrecognized cases increased statistically significantly from 1.03% to 1.47% during the same period. This yields a total prevalence of coeliac disease of 1.05% in 1978-80 and 1.99% in 2000-01. Conclusions: The total prevalence of coeliac disease seems to have doubled in Finland during the last two decades, and the increase cannot be attributed to the better detection rate. The environmental factors responsible for the increasing prevalence of the disorder are issues for further studies. © 2007 The Authors.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

1098Citations
1479Readers
Get full text
777Citations
1185Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lohi, S., Mustalahti, K., Kaukinen, K., Laurila, K., Collin, P., Rissanen, H., … Mäki, M. (2007). Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 26(9), 1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03502.x

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 127

68%

Researcher 49

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 118

55%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48

23%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 30

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 17

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0