An integrated statistical method to generate potential future climate scenarios to analyse droughts

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate different methods to generate future potential climatic scenarios at monthly scale considering meteorological droughts. We assume that more reliable scenarios would be generated by using regional climatic models (RCMs) and statistical correction techniques that produce better approximations to the historical basic and drought statistics. A multi-objective analysis is proposed to identify the inferior approaches. Different ensembles (equifeasible and non-equifeasible) solutions are analysed, identifying their pros and cons. A sensitivity analysis of the method to spatial scale is also performed. The proposed methodology is applied in an alpine basin, the Alto Genil (southern Spain). The method requires historical climatic information and simulations provided by multiple RCMs (9 RCMs are considered in the proposed application) for a future period, assuming a potential emission scenario. We generate future series by applying two conceptual approaches, bias correction and delta change, using five statistical transformation techniques for each. The application shows that the method allows improvement of the definition of local climate scenarios from the RCM simulation considering drought statistics. The sensitivity of the results to the applied approach is analysed.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Collados-Lara, A. J., Pulido-Velazquez, D., & Pardo-Igúzquiza, E. (2018). An integrated statistical method to generate potential future climate scenarios to analyse droughts. Water (Switzerland), 10(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091224

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

61%

Researcher 6

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

31%

Engineering 5

31%

Environmental Science 4

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free