Clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for gastrointestinal neoplasms: A systematic review

66Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) is frequently shown to be dosimetrically superior to photon radiotherapy (RT), though supporting data for clinical benefit are severely limited. Because of the potential for toxicity reduction in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, we systematically reviewed the literature on clinical outcomes (survival/toxicity) of PBT. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, abstracts from meetings of the American Society for Radiation Oncology, Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group, and American Society of Clinical Oncology was conducted for publications from 2000-2015. Thirty-eight original investigations were analyzed. Results: Although results of PBT are not directly comparable to historical data, outcomes roughly mirror previous data, generally with reduced toxicities for PBT in some neoplasms. For esophageal cancer, PBT is associated with reduced toxicities, postoperative complications, and hospital stay as compared to photon radiation, while achieving comparable local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). In pancreatic cancer, numerical survival for resected/unresected cases is also similar to existing photon data, whereas grade =3 nausea/emesis and post-operative complications are numerically lower than those reported with photon RT. The strongest data in support of PBT for HCC comes from phase II trials demonstrating very low toxicities, and a phase III trial of PBT versus transarterial chemoembolization demonstrating trends towards improved LC and progression-free survival (PFS) with PBT, along with fewer post-treatment hospitalizations. Survival and toxicity data for cholangiocarcinoma, liver metastases, and retroperitoneal sarcoma are also roughly equivalent to historical photon controls. There are two small reports for gastric cancer and three for anorectal cancer; these are not addressed further. Conclusions: Limited quality (and quantity) of data hamper direct comparisons and conclusions. However, the available data, despite the inherent caveats and limitations, suggest that PBT offers the potential to achieve significant reduction in treatment-related toxicities without compromising survival or LC for multiple GI malignancies. Several randomized comparative trials are underway that will provide more definitive answers.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

9279Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer

4530Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781

1224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

740Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Proton Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

“Radiobiology of Proton Therapy”: Results of an international expert workshop

93Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verma, V., Lin, S. H., Simone, C. B., & Mehta, M. P. (2016). Clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for gastrointestinal neoplasms: A systematic review. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 7(4), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2016.05.06

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

51%

Researcher 12

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 31

74%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

12%

Physics and Astronomy 4

10%

Engineering 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0