Rigor, transparency, evidence, and representation in discourse analysis: Challenges and recommendations

75Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Discourse analysis is an important qualitative research approach across social science disciplines for analyzing (and challenging) how reality in a variety of organizational and institutional arenas is constructed. However, the process of conducting empirical discourse analyses remains challenging. In this article, we identify four key challenges involved in doing discourse analysis and recommend several “tools” derived from empirical practice to address these challenges. We demonstrate these recommendations by drawing on examples from an empirical discourse analysis study we conducted. Our tools and recommendations aim to facilitate conducting and writing up discourse analyses and may also contribute to addressing the identified challenges in other qualitative methodologies.

References Powered by Scopus

Qualitative quality: Eight a"big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research

3977Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Techniques to Identify Themes

3532Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research

2731Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Expertise in Everyday Nurse–Patient Conversations: The Importance of Small Talk

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

No Disrespect: A Womanist Critique of Respectability Discourses in Extracurricular Programming for Black Girls

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Poetically Poking at Language and Power: Using Black Feminist Poetry to Conduct Rigorous Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greckhamer, T., & Cilesiz, S. (2014). Rigor, transparency, evidence, and representation in discourse analysis: Challenges and recommendations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 422–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691401300123

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 89

77%

Researcher 11

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 40

47%

Linguistics 17

20%

Business, Management and Accounting 15

17%

Arts and Humanities 14

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0