Acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) fermentation guarantees a sustainable route for biohydrogen and biobutanol production. This research work is committed towards the enhancement of biohydrogen and biobutanol production by single and multi-parameter optimization for the improvement of substrate energy recovery using C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum. Single parameters optimization (SPO) manifested that headspace of 60% (v/v) and butyric acid supplementation of 9 g/L and temperatures of 30 °C and 37 °C were suitable for obtaining maximum biohydrogen and biobutanol production, respectively. The interaction between these parameters was further evaluated by implementing a 5-level 3-factor Central Composite Design (CCD). In the present study, a central composite design was employed to enhance the biohydrogen and biobutanol production. In addition, the experimental results were analyzed by response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques such as artificial neural network (ANN). The prediction capability of RSM was further compared with ANN for predicting the optimum parameters that would lead to maximum biohydrogen and biobutanol production. ANN yielded higher values of biohydrogen and biobutanol. ANN was found to be superior as compared to RSM in terms of prediction accuracy for both biohydrogen and biobutanol because of its higher coefficient of determination (R2) and lower root mean square error (RMSE) value. Process temperature (32.65 °C), headspace (58.21% (v/v)) and butyric acid supplementation (9.16 g/L) led to maximum substrate energy recovery of 78% with biohydrogen and biobutanol production of 5.9 L/L and 16.75 g/L, respectively. Process parameter optimization led to a significant increase in substrate energy recovery from Biphasic fermentation.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Yadav, S., Singh, V., Mahata, C., & Das, D. (2021). Optimization for simultaneous enhancement of biobutanol and biohydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(5), 3726–3741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.267