Proximities and interactions: A new formulation

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper revisits the relation between proximity and interactions, in the light of new thoughts on the concepts of proximity. We start from the idea that proximity, in the most general sense, reflects the easiness to interact. It results that: (1) proximity can be expressed in terms of costs; (2) different forms of proximity correspond to different modes of interaction and to the associated costs. On the basis of these premises and of the various forms of the concept in the economics of proximity and in the economics of agglomeration, we suggest to deal with four forms of proximity, three of them closely linked to the economics of proximity, and one entirely new: virtual geographical proximity. © 2009 Lavoisier, Paris. Tous droits réservés.

References Powered by Scopus

Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations

640Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information Technology and the Future of Cities

431Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The metropolis in retrospect from the trading metropolis to the global metropolis

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Development and patterns of short food supply chains in Limousin (France): Weak political and institutional framework - Strong spatial and relational proximities.

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Proximity and organizational factors for startup – Large firm collaboration in an open innovation context

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of digital technologies on perceptions of proximity

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bourdeau-Lepage, L., & Huriot, J. M. (2009). Proximities and interactions: A new formulation. Geographie Economie Societe, 11(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.3166/ges.11.233-249

Readers over time

‘10‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

86%

Researcher 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 7

54%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

31%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Sports and Recreations 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0