Dark matter halos: The dynamical basis of effective empirical models

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigate the dynamical basis of the classic empirical models (specifically, Sérsic-Einasto and generalized NFW) that are widely used to describe the distributions of collisionless matter in galaxies. We submit that such a basis is provided by our -profiles, shown to constitute solutions of the Jeans dynamical equilibrium with physical boundary conditions. We show how to set the parameters of the empirical in terms of the dynamical models; we find the empirical models, and specifically Sérsic-Einasto, to constitute a simple and close approximation to the dynamical models. Finally, we discuss how these provide a useful baseline for assessing the impact of the small-scale dynamics that may modulate the density slope in the central galaxy regions. © 2011 Andrea Lapi and Alfonso Cavaliere.

References Powered by Scopus

A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering

8191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Five-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe observations: Cosmological interpretation

4383Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An analytical model for spherical galaxies and bulges

2548Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Self-similar dynamical relaxation of dark matter halos in an expanding universe

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Revisiting the Bulge-Halo Conspiracy. I. Dependence on Galaxy Properties and Halo Mass

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Testing phenomenological and theoretical models of dark matter density profiles with galaxy clusters

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lapi, A., & Cavaliere, A. (2011). Dark matter halos: The dynamical basis of effective empirical models. Advances in Astronomy, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/903429

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Researcher 3

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 10

83%

Engineering 1

8%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free