Does context matter? European-specific risk factors for radicalization

7Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study we sought to identify whether risk and protective factors for radicalization can be classed as 'universal' factors or whether they have heterogeneous cross-regional effects. Specifically, we sought to identify whether there were factors which displayed significantly different effects in European contexts compared to other democratic countries. We conduct a confirmatory meta-analysis based on a recent Campbell Collaboration systematic review and meta-analysis (Wolfowicz, Litmanovitz, Weisburd and Hasisi, 2021). Studies were classified as being from either EU or non-EU countries and moderator analysis was used to identify between-region heterogeneity. The analysis was possible for 23 factors pertaining to radical attitudes, 13 pertaining to radical intentions and 4 for radical behaviours. For radical attitudes, the estimates for European studies were significantly larger for Gender, Socio-economic status, and Parental involvement, whereas the estimates for Religiosity, Institutional trust, Integration, and Moral neutralizations were significantly smaller compared to other democratic countries in other regions. For radical intentions, the estimates for Self-esteem was significantly larger for European studies. For radical behaviours, the estimate for Unemployment was significantly larger for European studies than for democratic countries in other regions. Overall, most risk and protective factors for radicalization appear to have 'universal' effects across democratic countries, but there are some factors that may be more relevant for targeting by counter-radicalization in certain contexts. Although European counter-radicalization has often focused on factors such as integration and institutional trust, these factors have relatively small relationships with radicalization, and these relationships are even smaller in the European context compared to democratic countries in other regions. The findings suggest that mitigation strategies, and interventions providing employment opportunities in particular, may be well suited to the European context if the goal is to develop locally-oriented approaches to counter-radicalization.

References Powered by Scopus

Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Economic conditions, group relative deprivation and ethnic threat perceptions: a cross-national perspective

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Child maltreatment and adult criminal behavior: Does criminal thinking explain the association?

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mental disorder, psychological problems and terrorist behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What is the best approach for preventing recruitment to terrorism? Findings from ABM experiments in social and situational prevention

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Practitioners’ perspectives on the challenges of dealing with the interaction between mental illness and violent extremism in Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wolfowicz, M., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2021). Does context matter? European-specific risk factors for radicalization. Monatsschrift Fur Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform, 104(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2021-0132

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 5

56%

Social Sciences 3

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free