The IUCN Wild Pig Challenge 2015

3Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Asian mammal species are facing unprecedented pressures from hunting and habitat conversion. Efforts to mitigate these threats often focus on charismatic large-bodied species, while many other species or even guilds receive less attention, particularly Asian wild pigs. To address this we developed a rapid questionnaire survey and administered it to relevant experts to identify the presence, population trends and conservation needs of Asia's 11 threatened wild pig species. The results highlighted geographical differences within species (e.g. the near collapse of bearded pig populations in Peninsular Malaysia yet their widespread presence on Borneo), and knowledge gaps for many endemic species of the Philippines, notably the Critically Endangered Visayan warty pig Sus cebifrons. To support field-based conservation projects, we identified 66 medium-to-large zoos in Asia, Europe and the USA that house Asian wild pigs and have applicable conservation funding schemes. Our rapid survey method, which yielded 170 wild pig records from across Asia, proved effective in filling many of the existing knowledge gaps, and may be widely applicable in assessing the status and needs of other non-flagship threatened species.

References Powered by Scopus

Eliciting Expert Knowledge in Conservation Science

632Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using expert opinion surveys to rank threats to endangered species: A case study with sea turtles

115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping uncertainty: Sensitivity of wildlife habitat ratings to expert opinion

100Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Linkie, M., Ng, J., Lim, Z. Q., Lubis, M. I., Rademaker, M., & Meijaard, E. (2017). The IUCN Wild Pig Challenge 2015. ORYX, 51(3), 477–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000557

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Researcher 5

38%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

56%

Environmental Science 7

39%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0