Development of free will and determinism scale in Japanese

8Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We developed a free will and determinism scale in Japanese (FAD-J) to assess lay beliefs in free will, scientific determinism, fatalistic determinism, and unpredictability. In Study 1, we translated a free will and determinism scale (FAD-Plus) into Japanese and verified its reliability and validity. In Study 2, we examined the relationship between the FAD-J and eight other scales. Results suggested that lay beliefs in free will and determinism were related to self-regulation, critical thinking, other-oriented empathy, self-esteem, and regret and maximization in decision makings. We discuss the usefulness of the FAD-J for studying the psychological functions of lay beliefs in free will and determinism.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.

12580Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Executive functions and self-regulation

1418Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating

514Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Counteractive control over temptations: Promoting resistance through enhanced perception of conflict and goal value

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Questionnaire Data From the Revision of a Chinese Version of Free Will and Determinism Plus Scale

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Belief in free will indirectly contributes to the strategic transition through sympathetic arousal

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goto, T., Ishibashi, Y., Kajimura, S., Oka, R., & Kusumi, T. (2015). Development of free will and determinism scale in Japanese. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 86(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.86.13233

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

65%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

18%

Researcher 3

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 13

81%

Philosophy 1

6%

Design 1

6%

Neuroscience 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free