Modeling of surfactant and surfactant–polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery using STARS (CMG) software

66Citations
Citations of this article
170Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Chemical flooding methods are now getting importance in enhanced oil recovery to recover the trapped oil after conventional recovery. Investigation has been made to characterize the surfactant solution in terms of its ability to reduce the surface tension and the interaction between surfactant and polymer in its aqueous solution. A series of flooding experiments have been carried out to find the additional recovery using surfactant and surfactant–polymer slug. Approximately 0.5 pore volume (PV) surfactant (sodium dodecylsulfate) slug was injected in surfactant flooding, while 0.3 PV surfactant slug and 0.2 PV polymer (partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide) slug were injected for surfactant–polymer flooding. In each case, chase water was used to maintain the pressure gradient. The present work sought to determine whether or not a commercially available simulator could accurately simulate results from core flooding experiments. The adherence to physically realistic input values with respect to experimentally derived parameters was of primary importance during the development of the models. When specific values were not available for certain simulation parameters, a reasonable range of assumptions was made and both the water cut and cumulative oil production were successfully matched. Ultimately, understanding how to simulate the surfactant and polymer behavior on a core scale will improve the ability to model polymer floods on the field scale.

References Powered by Scopus

EOR Screening Criteria Reyisited - Part 1 : Introduction to Screening Criteria and Enhanced Recovery Field Projects

743Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

POLYMER FLOODING REVIEW.

317Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MODELING CRUDE OILS FOR LOW INTERFACIAL TENSION.

184Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Critical review of field EOR projects in shale and tight reservoirs

247Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review on chemical enhanced oil recovery using polymer flooding: Fundamentals, experimental and numerical simulation

185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chemical enhanced oil recovery and the role of chemical product design

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rai, S. K., Bera, A., & Mandal, A. (2015). Modeling of surfactant and surfactant–polymer flooding for enhanced oil recovery using STARS (CMG) software. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-014-0112-3

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 52

69%

Researcher 11

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 54

69%

Energy 11

14%

Chemical Engineering 10

13%

Chemistry 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0