Culture and Identity in Comparative Political Analysis

  • Ross M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Ross’s lengthy article represents a thorough and broad-ranging assessment of contemporary political culture theory. (See also Lane 1992.) After defining culture somewhat differently from either Almond or Elkins and Simeon (as a system of meaning and identity), Ross takes up four topics in turn. First, he outlines five distinctive contributions that political culture theories make to the study of comparative politics. Second, he isolates five central themes of contemporary political culture applications. Third and perhaps most interesting, he culls five important criticisms of political culture theories from the contemporary literature of comparative political analysis. Fourth, Ross shows how political culture theories might enrich studies focusing on topics beyond explicitly political subjects (e.g., government institutions) such as the economy. Like Almond as well as Elkins and Simeon, Ross concludes that political culture theory holds much promise for helping us to explain social life in a fashion consistent with the demands of empirical social science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ross, M. H. (2000). Culture and Identity in Comparative Political Analysis. In Culture and Politics (pp. 39–70). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62397-6_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free