Aging of plasma-activated carbon surfaces: Challenges and opportunities

40Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Plasma-activated carbon surfaces demonstrate an immediately enhanced surface energy, wettability, and roughness and perform considerably well in their intended applications. However, as the time progresses, plasma-treated carbon materials rapidly lose the generated features and functions as a result of aging. While plasma-generated surface functional groups reorient themselves in an attempt to occupy lower states of energy, the surface begins to also suffer from a brief shelf life that severely impacts its performance in various disciplines. This time-induced decay of the surface that manifests as the gradual loss of surface properties and functionalities is rarely mentioned or discussed in the literature. The main contribution of plasma treatment is to produce activated and functional platforms that can serve several applications including environmental monitoring, bio-diagnosis, food quality control, and extreme point-of-care. To reach the hands of final users at any of these destinations, plasma-activated carbon platforms have to remain active and stable over an acceptable period of time to fulfill their purpose. The current review article is an effort to garner the attention of the scientific community to this shortcoming and gather all the existing evidences on the aging of plasma-activated carbon platforms.

References Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ortiz-Ortega, E., Hosseini, S., Martinez-Chapa, S. O., & Madou, M. J. (2021, November 1). Aging of plasma-activated carbon surfaces: Challenges and opportunities. Applied Surface Science. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150362

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

50%

Researcher 4

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 6

40%

Materials Science 5

33%

Chemical Engineering 2

13%

Engineering 2

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 15

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0