Recycling of RAP using nanoclay modified asphalt binder

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The incorporation of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) in the recycling process of asphalt pavement can save both the environment and money. This study was conducted to investigate the use of nanomodified asphalt binder in the recycling of RAP material to increase the incorporation of RAP percentage in recycled asphalt compared to using neat (unmodified) asphalt binder. For this evaluation, a nanoclay modified and unmodified binder was used. The RAP (aged) binder was prepared by putting the unmodified binder in the Rolling Thin Film Oven (RTFO) and two cycles of Pressure Aging Vessel (PAV). Then, the rutting, fatigue, and low-temperature performance of recycled binders with different percentages of RAP during the aging of the binder were evaluate by performing Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR) at low temperature and Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR) at high-temperature and medium temperatures. The results demonstrated that the maximum use of 20% RAP binder (33% RAP material) was allowed in the recycled pavement using nanomodified binder. While the maximum use of 10% RAP binder (17% RAP material) was allowed with the unmodified binder. This increase in the incorporation of RAP percentage in recycled asphalt pavement can pave the path to industrialize the use of the nanomodified binder in the recycling of asphalt pavement and its usage in severe weather conditions.

References Powered by Scopus

378Citations
342Readers
Get full text
Get full text
330Citations
218Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baqersad, M., & Ali, H. (2021). Recycling of RAP using nanoclay modified asphalt binder. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 14(6), 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-021-0112-x

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

57%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

83%

Materials Science 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0