Use of Rh immune globulin: ASCP practice parameter

72Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The use of Rh immune globulin (RhIG) has dramatically decreased the incidence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn resulting from the production of anti-D by an Rh-negative woman. However, despite the widespread use of RhIG, instances of Rh immunization continue to occur, most likely through failure to administer RhIG when indicated or in the appropriate dose. This utilization gap can be closed only through continued active surveillance by health care providers. The following report summarizes recommendations for the administration of RhIG, the dose required in various circumstances, prenatal and postnatal serologic testing of the obstetric patient, and the methods used to determine the degree of fetomaternal hemorrhage or the amount of Rh-positive RBCs in the circulation.

References Powered by Scopus

Demonstration von fetalem Hämoglobin in den Erythrocyten eines Blutausstrichs

558Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intravenous anti-D treatment of immune thrombocytopenic purpura: Experience in 272 patients

294Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A prospective controlled study of outcome after trauma during pregnancy

291Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Flow cytometry: Principles and clinical applications in hematology

351Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy

217Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

BCSH guideline for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn

153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hartwell, E. A. (1998). Use of Rh immune globulin: ASCP practice parameter. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 110(3), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/110.3.281

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Researcher 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

70%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

10%

Engineering 1

10%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free