The anemone: Theoretical foundations for UX evaluation of action and intention recognition in human-robot interaction

27Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The coexistence of robots and humans in shared physical and social spaces is expected to increase. A key enabler of high-quality interaction is a mutual understanding of each other’s actions and intentions. In this paper, we motivate and present a systematic user experience (UX) evaluation framework of action and intention recognition between humans and robots from a UX perspective, because there is an identified lack of this kind of evaluation methodology. The evaluation framework is packaged into a methodological approach called ANEMONE (action and intention recognition in human robot interaction). ANEMONE has its foundation in cultural-historical activity theory (AT) as the theoretical lens, the seven stages of action model, and user experience (UX) evaluation methodology, which together are useful in motivating and framing the work presented in this paper. The proposed methodological approach of ANEMONE provides guidance on how to measure, assess, and evaluate the mutual recognition of actions and intentions between humans and robots for investigators of UX evaluation. The paper ends with a discussion, addresses future work, and some concluding remarks.

References Powered by Scopus

The mirror-neuron system

6052Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition

3110Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A survey of socially interactive robots

2380Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cobots in Industry 4.0: A Roadmap for Future Practice Studies on Human-Robot Collaboration

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of User Experience in Human–Robot Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

User experience in social robots

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lindblom, J., & Alenljung, B. (2020). The anemone: Theoretical foundations for UX evaluation of action and intention recognition in human-robot interaction. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(15), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154284

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

76%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Researcher 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 12

46%

Engineering 9

35%

Psychology 3

12%

Decision Sciences 2

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0