Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors

4Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Falls are one of the most common causes of emergency hospital visits in older people. Early recognition of an increased fall risk, which can be indicated by the occurrence of near-falls, is important to initiate interventions. Methods: In a study with 87 subjects we simulated near-fall events on a perturbation treadmill and recorded them with inertial measurement units (IMU) at seven different positions. We investigated different machine learning models for the near-fall detection including support vector machines, AdaBoost, convolutional neural networks, and bidirectional long short-term memory networks. Additionally, we analyzed the influence of the sensor position on the classification results. Results: The best results showed a DeepConvLSTM with an F1 score of 0.954 (precision 0.969, recall 0.942) at the sensor position “left wrist.” Discussion: Since these results were obtained in the laboratory, the next step is to evaluate the suitability of the classifiers in the field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hellmers, S., Krey, E., Gashi, A., Koschate, J., Schmidt, L., Stuckenschneider, T., … Zieschang, T. (2023). Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors. Frontiers in Digital Health, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1223845

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free