Performance of two interferon-gamma release assays for tuberculosis infection screening in Kawasaki children before immunosuppressive therapy

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and X.DOT-TB for screening latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in kawasaki patients, and to identify the risk factors associated with indeterminate IGRA results. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on children with KD, who were screened for mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection by either ELISA-based QFT-GIT or ELISPOT-based X.DOT-TB tests, admitted in Department of Cardiology, Beijing Children's Hospital from July 2019 to April 2022. Results: A total of 1327 cases were included. Among them, 932 cases were tested by QFT-GIT and 395 cases by X.DOT-TB. The positive rate of children was 0.1% and 0.2%, and the indeterminate rate was 68.2% and 6.1% for QFT-GIT and X.DOT-TB, respectively. Patients with hypoproteinemia had a higher risk of indeterminate X.DOT-TB result. Female, critical ill, shock or hypoproteinemia presented statistically significant associations with an increased risk of indeterminate QFT-GIT result. High-dose of IVIG inhibited the release of IFN-γ by more than 90%, which might account for the high indeterminate incidence. Conclusion: It is recommended to perform X.DOT-TB rather than QFT-GIT to screen LTBI in patients with high level of the mitogen that can inhibit IFN-γ release. For KD children with positive IGRA results, it has a higher risk of activation TB infection when treated with immunosuppressive therapy in the future. Children with KD aged <5 years old had higher frequency of indeterminate IGRA results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, H., Zheng, H., Cui, L., Xiao, J., Li, F., Wang, Y., … Shen, C. (2023). Performance of two interferon-gamma release assays for tuberculosis infection screening in Kawasaki children before immunosuppressive therapy. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1162547

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free