2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

2.6kCitations
Citations of this article
1.3kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective To develop a new evidence-based, pharmacologic treatment guideline for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods We conducted systematic reviews to synthesize the evidence for the benefits and harms of various treatment options. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence. We employed a group consensus process to grade the strength of recommendations (either strong or conditional). A strong recommendation indicates that clinicians are certain that the benefits of an intervention far outweigh the harms (or vice versa). A conditional recommendation denotes uncertainty over the balance of benefits and harms and/or more significant variability in patient values and preferences. Results The guideline covers the use of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in early (<6 months) and established (≥6 months) RA. In addition, it provides recommendations on using a treat-to-target approach, tapering and discontinuing medications, and the use of biologic agents and DMARDs in patients with hepatitis, congestive heart failure, malignancy, and serious infections. The guideline addresses the use of vaccines in patients starting/receiving DMARDs or biologic agents, screening for tuberculosis in patients starting/receiving biologic agents or tofacitinib, and laboratory monitoring for traditional DMARDs. The guideline includes 74 recommendations: 23% are strong and 77% are conditional. Conclusion This RA guideline should serve as a tool for clinicians and patients (our two target audiences) for pharmacologic treatment decisions in commonly encountered clinical situations. These recommendations are not prescriptive, and the treatment decisions should be made by physicians and patients through a shared decision-making process taking into account patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.

References Powered by Scopus

The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis

19385Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

15144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative

7147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Rheumatoid arthritis

3522Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update

2070Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update

2050Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, J. A., Saag, K. G., Bridges, S. L., Akl, E. A., Bannuru, R. R., Sullivan, M. C., … McAlindon, T. (2016). 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatology, 68(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39480

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 426

65%

Researcher 138

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 63

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 32

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 467

67%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 99

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 76

11%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 55

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
News Mentions: 102
References: 3
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 38

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free