Oral Pregabalin in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

8Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Pregabalin has received wide clinical attention as a new type of analgesic. We undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of pregabalin on postoperative pain in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (from inception to July 2020) for eligible studies. The primary outcomes were the total morphine consumption at 24 h. A secondary outcome was intraoperative fentanyl consumption, extubation time postoperative, and length of stay in hospital. We calculated pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs using random- or fixed-effects models. Results. Seven trials involving 463 patients were listed. Meta-analysis showed that the total morphine consumption at 24 h in the pregabalin group was significantly less than the control group (WMD: -5.44, 95% CI: -10.42-0.46, P=0.03). We found that there is no significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative fentanyl consumption. Compared with the control group, the length of stay in hospital in the pregabalin group was significantly shorter (WMD = -0.87, 95% CI: -1.42-0.32, P=0.002). And we found that there were no significant differences between the two groups in extubation time (WMD: 17.24, 95% CI: -24.36-58.84, P=0.42). Conclusions. Oral pregabalin for cardiac surgery patients can effectively reduce the patient's 24-hour morphine consumption after surgery, shorten the patient's hospital stay, and is more conducive to early postoperative recovery.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53614Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

25923Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?

14786Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analgesic Efficacy of Gabapentin and Pregabalin in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A simple and rapid spectrophotometric method coupled with intelligent approaches for the simultaneous determination of antiepileptic drugs in pharmaceutical formulations, biological, serological, and breast milk samples

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative Efficacy of Adjuvant Nonopioid Analgesia in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, X. X., Dai, J., Hu, X. G., Zhou, A. G., & Pan, D. B. (2021). Oral Pregabalin in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. BioMed Research International. Hindawi Limited. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8835891

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

74%

Researcher 3

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

72%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

20%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

4%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0