Emotional Memories in Laboratory Studies versus Real-life Studies: Do they compare?

  • Christianson S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article compares some of the empirical findings from laboratory studies and real-life studies conceming emotional memories, focusing on how detailed and persistent these memories are over time. Some recent research is presented indicating that emotional memories are relatively accurate and persistent with respect to central details of violent acts or accidents (e.g.,the victim/perpetrator, action, weapon, clothing), but not necessarily with respect to peripheral details or surrounding circumstances of the emotional ineident (e.g., bystanders, date, time). Instead of assuming that emotional memories in laboratory and real-life settings are qualitatively different, as has been claimed elsewhere in the literature (e.g., Yuille & Cutshall, 1989, in press), it is concluded that memory performance of witnesses to an actual crime or aceident compares to findings in laboratory research on emotional events.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christianson, S.-Å. (1992). Emotional Memories in Laboratory Studies versus Real-life Studies: Do they compare? In Theoretical Perspectives on Autobiographical Memory (pp. 339–352). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7967-4_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free