This article compares some of the empirical findings from laboratory studies and real-life studies conceming emotional memories, focusing on how detailed and persistent these memories are over time. Some recent research is presented indicating that emotional memories are relatively accurate and persistent with respect to central details of violent acts or accidents (e.g.,the victim/perpetrator, action, weapon, clothing), but not necessarily with respect to peripheral details or surrounding circumstances of the emotional ineident (e.g., bystanders, date, time). Instead of assuming that emotional memories in laboratory and real-life settings are qualitatively different, as has been claimed elsewhere in the literature (e.g., Yuille & Cutshall, 1989, in press), it is concluded that memory performance of witnesses to an actual crime or aceident compares to findings in laboratory research on emotional events.
CITATION STYLE
Christianson, S.-Å. (1992). Emotional Memories in Laboratory Studies versus Real-life Studies: Do they compare? In Theoretical Perspectives on Autobiographical Memory (pp. 339–352). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7967-4_20
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.