Recent advances on the mechanisms of kidney stone formation (Review)

147Citations
Citations of this article
328Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Kidney stone disease is one of the oldest diseases known to medicine; however, the mechanisms of stone formation and development remain largely unclear. Over the past decades, a variety of theories and strategies have been developed and utilized in the surgical management of kidney stones, as a result of recent technological advances. Observations from the authors and other research groups suggest that there are five entirely different main mechanisms for kidney stone formation. Urinary supersaturation and crystallization are the driving force for intrarenal crystal precipitation. Randall's plaques are recognized as the origin of calcium oxalate stone formation. Sex hormones may be key players in the development of nephrolithiasis and may thus be potential targets for new drugs to suppress kidney stone formation. The microbiome, including urease-producing bacteria, nanobacteria and intestinal microbiota, is likely to have a profound effect on urological health, both positive and negative, owing to its metabolic output and other contributions. Lastly, the immune response, and particularly macrophage differentiation, play crucial roles in renal calcium oxalate crystal formation. In the present study, the current knowledge for each of these five aspects of kidney stone formation is reviewed. This knowledge may be used to explore novel research opportunities and improve the understanding of the initiation and development of kidney stones for urologists, nephrologists and primary care.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Deng, Q., & Liang, H. (2021, August 1). Recent advances on the mechanisms of kidney stone formation (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine. Spandidos Publications. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2021.4982

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

55%

Researcher 17

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 36

48%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 20

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 11

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free