Humoral and Cellular Immunogenicity and Safety of Five Different SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases in Remission or With Low Disease Activity and in Healthy Controls: A Single Center Study

26Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Vaccine-induced immunity is essential for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on humoral and cellular immunogenicity and safety of different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are limited. Methods: A single center observational study evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of the two-dose regimen of the BBIBP-CorV inactivated, Gam-COVID-Vac and AZD1222 adenovirus-based, and BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 mRNA-based vaccines in patients with RMDs (n = 89) compared with healthy controls (n = 74). Neutralizing anti-RBD (receptor binding domain) specific antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response were measured one and four months after the second vaccine dose in parallel with vaccination efficacy and safety. Results: Disease-specific comparison showed that antibody response at four months was higher in spondylarthropathies compared to rheumatoid arthritis and autoimmune RMDs. Risk factors for reduced immunogenicity included longer disease duration, positive immunoserological profile and anti-CD20 therapy of patients. The rate of positive anti-RBD antibody response for healthy controls versus patients after 4 months post vaccination was 69% vs. 55% for the inactivated viral vaccine BBIBP-CorV, 97% vs. 53% for the pooled data of adenovirus vector-based vaccines Gam-COVID-Vac and AZD1222, or 100% vs. 81% for the pooled data of mRNA vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively. Patients who received the Gam-COVID-Vac or mRNA-1273 vaccines had a higher proportion of TNF-α producing CD4+ T-cells upon SARS-CoV-2 antigen stimulation compared to the inactivated viral vaccine. Conclusion: All five investigated vaccines were immunogenic in the majority of patients and healthy controls with variable antibody and T-cell response and an acceptable safety profile.

References Powered by Scopus

Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine

11024Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

10126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

7739Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

COVID-19 vaccination in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review of its effectiveness, immunogenicity, flares and acceptance

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors influencing the SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination induced immune response in rheumatoid arthritis

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy of mRNA and Inactivated Whole Virus Vaccines Against COVID-19 in Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szebeni, G. J., Gémes, N., Honfi, D., Szabó, E., Neuperger, P., Balog, J., … Balog, A. (2022). Humoral and Cellular Immunogenicity and Safety of Five Different SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases in Remission or With Low Disease Activity and in Healthy Controls: A Single Center Study. Frontiers in Immunology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.846248

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

21%

Researcher 3

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

48%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

22%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 4

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free