Flexible coordination of stationary and mobile conversations with gaze: Resource allocation among multiple joint activities

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Gaze is instrumental in coordinating face-to-face social interactions. But little is known about gaze use when social interactions co-occur with other joint activities. We investigated the case of walking while talking. We assessed how gaze gets allocated among various targets in mobile conversations, whether allocation of gaze to other targets affects conversational coordination, and whether reduced availability of gaze for conversational coordination affects conversational performance and content. In an experimental study, pairs were videotaped in four conditions of mobility (standing still, talking while walking along a straight-line itinerary, talking while walking along a complex itinerary, or walking along a complex itinerary with no conversational task). Gaze to partners was substantially reduced in mobile conversations, but gaze was still used to coordinate conversation via displays of mutual orientation, and conversational performance and content was not different between stationary and mobile conditions. Results expand the phenomena of multitasking to joint activities.

Figures

  • FIGURE 1 | (A) Talk-only condition. (B) Lateral view of the perch. (C) Talk-and-navigate condition, pair turning to their left. (D) Talk-and-navigate condition, pair engaged in mutual gaze.
  • FIGURE 2 | Gaze allocation in stationary and mobile conversations. (A) Proportion of gaze at partner. (B) Proportion of gaze at map. (C) Proportion of gaze elsewhere. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.
  • TABLE 1 | Mixed-effects logistic regression summaries for predictors testing the listener response hypothesis for verbal behavior (recent narrator gaze as predictor for verbal listener response) in two conditions.
  • TABLE 2 | Mixed-effects logistic regression summaries for predictors testing the listener response hypothesis for non-verbal behavior (recent narrator gaze as predictor of listener gaze initiation), and the periodic-monitoring hypothesis (recent listener gaze as predictor for listener gaze initiation) in two conditions.

References Powered by Scopus

Task switching

2688Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction

1529Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contributing to discourse

1043Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Listening: Processes, functions, and competency

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ethnomethodological studies of nurse-patient and nurse-relative interactions: A scoping review

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Building Situation Awareness on the Move: Staff Monitoring Behavior in Clinic Corridors

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mayor, E., & Bangerter, A. (2016). Flexible coordination of stationary and mobile conversations with gaze: Resource allocation among multiple joint activities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01582

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 3

50%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Sports and Recreations 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0