Healthcare utilization and costs of systemic lupus erythematosus in medicaid

75Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. Healthcare utilization and costs associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a US Medicaid population were examined. Methods. Patients ≥ 18 years old with SLE diagnosis (ICD-9-CM 710.0x) were extracted from a large Medicaid database 2002-2009. Index date was date of the first SLE diagnosis. Patients with and without SLE were matched. All patients had a variable length of followup with a minimum of 12 months. Annualized healthcare utilization and costs associated with SLE and costs of SLE flares were assessed during the followup period. Multivariate regressions were conducted to estimate incremental healthcare utilization and costs associated with SLE. Results. A total of 14,777 SLE patients met the study criteria, and 14,262 were matched to non-SLE patients. SLE patients had significantly higher healthcare utilization per year than their matched controls. The estimated incremental annual cost associated with SLE was $10,984, with the highest increase in inpatient costs (P < 0.001). Cost per flare was $11,716 for severe flares, $562 for moderate flares, and $129 for mild flares. Annual total costs for patients with severe flares were $49,754. Conclusions. SLE patients had significantly higher healthcare resource utilization and costs than non-SLE patients. Patients with severe flares had the highest costs. © 2013 Hong J. Kan et al.

Figures

  • Figure 2), holding everything else constant.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kan, H. J., Song, X., Johnson, B. H., Bechtel, B., O’Sullivan, D., & Molta, C. T. (2013). Healthcare utilization and costs of systemic lupus erythematosus in medicaid. BioMed Research International, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/808391

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

61%

Researcher 13

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

46%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

31%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

11%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 15

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0