A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems

495Citations
Citations of this article
1.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper reviews the state of the art in cyber security risk assessment of Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems. We select and in-detail examine twenty-four risk assessment methods developed for or applied in the context of a SCADA system. We describe the essence of the methods and then analyse them in terms of aim; application domain; the stages of risk management addressed; key risk management concepts covered; impact measurement; sources of probabilistic data; evaluation and tool support. Based on the analysis, we suggest an intuitive scheme for the categorisation of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems. We also outline five research challenges facing the domain and point out the approaches that might be taken.

References Powered by Scopus

Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology

39962Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On The Quantitative Definition of Risk

2391Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering

739Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A systems and control perspective of CPS security

412Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cloud-Assisted IoT-Based SCADA Systems Security: A Review of the State of the Art and Future Challenges

345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cybersecurity for industrial control systems: A survey

235Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cherdantseva, Y., Burnap, P., Blyth, A., Eden, P., Jones, K., Soulsby, H., & Stoddart, K. (2016, February 1). A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems. Computers and Security. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.009

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 540

74%

Researcher 81

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 57

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 56

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 444

60%

Engineering 209

28%

Social Sciences 43

6%

Business, Management and Accounting 43

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 10

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free